Puffing and jumping airbags
In 1997 the Mars Pathfinder probe hit the ground of Mars protected by
airbags. Those airbags covered the whole surface of the outer spheric
protective shell of the probe. They were inflated just a moment before
impact using gas generators. Thanks to them the impact deceleration was
kept well below the maximum. After a few bounces and rolling, the probe
stand still. The airbags were deflated and redrawn by inner kevlar
wires. The protective shell of the probe was opened a way that forces
the probe to stand upside (yet it was already upside).
Web pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10.
A pdf document: 1.
Maybe an enhancement to the airbags would be to allow them to
release gas during the first impact. This can be done either two ways:
- Suddenly release the gas when the probe reaches 0 m/s velocity
towards the ground. Thus when the pressure reaches its maximum. This
can be done by an explosive wire on the bottom airbags external side.
- Let the gas stream out of the airbags throughout the impact. The
pressure would be held below a given maximum. This can be obtained by
calibrated holes in the airbags or valves that open at low pressure.
Possibly a merge of these two base systems should be used. Both to keep
the deceleration below a maximum and halt the probe at the end.
That way the probe will not bounce back after the first impact. It
will stand still or almost.
This would have some advantages:
- The probe will endure only one impact. And the deceleration
forces will only occur towards the bottom of the probe. It will not
have to withstand deceleration forces towards random directions.
- The airbags themselves just have to withstand one impact. They
can be less rugged against stone puncture and abrasion. Holes punctured
by stones would be of no importance (so long the airbags material
resists further tearing apart of the holes). Thus the airbags can be
more lightweight. Reciprocally they can be bigger and provide a softer
landing. Maybe in some cases they can become big enough to avoid the
need for a huge parachute and final rocket break system.
- The probe will land upside and stay that way. So there is no need
for airbags on the upper side of the probe shell. Either they can be
removed or very light airbag-shaped balloons can be used for
aerodynamic reasons. A ballute can be used around the sides of the
probe. A second advantage is the system that makes the probe stand up
can be removed or simplified. Deflating the remaining gas in the
airbags in a right sequence should be enough to guarantee the probe
stands upside.
- Making just one hit the probe shell will less likely hit
dangerous big stone pikes and will less likely end its bouncing
trajectory halted by a big stone or wall that could hamper the probe
mission. Nevertheless this does not guarantee the probe will hit a
clear zone. Maybe an optical system should be used during the descend
to check the landing site and use some light sideways rocketry to
displace the shell even just a few meters aside.
And some disadvantages:
- If bigger airbags are used this means the system to redraw them
has to be bigger too. Or that other technological choices have to be
made to free the probe from its airbags. One way would be to keep the
side airbags inflated, release them and let them roll away blown by the
wind. Maybe carrying some equipment. (Such device may be best for
little probes. The little probe shell should be surrounded by say four
very big lightweight airbags. This allows for a high impact velocity.
Should some of the airbags be punctured this will be of no importance.
The first hit would not be braked completely, the airbag pressure
control would be designed so the probe bounces away a few tens of
meters further. Yet the airbags would be released just when the shell
starts that bounce trajectory. That way there would be no need for a
complex airbag redraw system. The probe shell just uses a remain of its
kinetic energy to get free from the airbags. There is a little risk, if
one airbag is punctured and will not be blown quickly away by the wind,
that it will be blown towards the probe and cover it one day. Minute
radio emitters should be latched to the airbags to check for the
airbags departure before opening the probe systems. Or the probe should
be mobile and go away. Probably best is to use no airbag at all below
the shell. Only airbags on the side yet very big ones. Maybe one on the
upside for aerodynamics and gas pressure repartition. The shell would
be ducked between the side airbags. When the whole hits the ground the
shell will hang between the airbags yet it will not touch the ground.
When the gas pressure amongst the airbags comes to its maximum and the
shell stands still, the airbags are released by explosive bolts. The
shell then just falls to the ground from a meter hight. But the
airbags, due do their pressure, will bounce away at high speed. One
sole enormous airbag can be used, placed above the shell and kept in
shape by ropes in order to be bend around the shell. Only the bottom
parts of the airbags have to be protected against rocks. A little part
of the shell can stay latched to the airbag. It will be accelerated
towards a high speed upwards. Once it reaches its maximum velocity an
explosive wire can open the whole bottom of the airbag, freeing the gas
at once. So the airbag will become just a long and small shape with a
solid head that will make it jump far away. (Maybe the gas pressure
inside the airbags can be used to make them blow further away like kid
balloons. But best is they keep their shape so the wind can easily
drive them away.))
- If the airbags are removed from the upper side of the probe it
becomes aerodynamically more complex and needs close tests and
computations. Maybe a parachute or ballute can be sufficient to keep it
upside. Furthermore if the parachute needs to be latched to the probe
till impact it can hinder the probe by falling upon it. Maybe a
parachute redraw system should be used just at impact to roll the
parachute back up. (A variant of this system can help brake the impact
: the rope between the parachute and the probe shell should be made
very long. A few tens of a seconds before impact an electric motor can
roll up the cable very quickly. This will increase the parachute force
on the probe shell and slow down the probe before impact. Then the
system can go on after impact to roll up the parachute completely.)
Gas output valves on the airbags of Mars Pathfinder were not used
because it could lead rocks to hurt the structure of the probe shell in
one of the bounce sequences. The proposal in this text implies no
bounces. So at first hand the problem is avoided. Nevertheless in some
design cases if the bottom airbags are blown open the probe shell still
can fall from a low height upon sharp rocks. The bottom of the shell
should be built to resist such event. Maybe with a layer of tiny
airbags. One solution to avoid gas bleeding airbags to deflate too much
and risk a hard impact would be to continuously reinflate them with a
gas generator during the bounces.
To avoid the shell to start rotating sideways on impact, the pressure
in the bottom airbags should be held equal amongst them. So big gas
ducts should exist between the airbags. Or the bottom should be made of
one huge airbag kept in shape by internal ropes and partitions. A more
high-tech way would be to keep the airbags separate but to explode them
open at slightly different moments. The airbag with the highest
pressure should be opened first, in order for the other airbags to make
the shell rotate back in place.
The shape of a folden probe or a big payload often can be made
relatively flat. In such case, one single big airbag below the shell,
held to a flat shape by tendons or open partitions, can be used. With
gas outlets on the sides of the airbag and an explosive wire all around
for the final halt. The bigger the load, the bigger the airbag can be
and the softer the landing will be. With even no need to redraw the
airbag afterwards.
A simplification would be to build the bottom airbag so it breaks
open by itself. The part of the airbag facing the ground would be
rugged against stones yet its sides would be build to explode by
themselves like a kid balloon once an impact pressure close to the
maximum is reached. Such passive system does not allow for a high
precision. Using an explosive wire lets the probe electronics decide
actively and precisely when to break the bottom airbags open.
Nevertheless this could be usable for little simplified shells. Most of
the kinetic energy would be evacuated using such a passive
self-exploding airbag and the shell would only make a few little
bounces, needing few protection.
The role of the airbag gas exploding sideways during the final
airbag blast is to carry away the kinetic energy of the falling shell.
When the airbag touches the ground its gas is compressed by the probe
motion. During the compression process the kinetic energy of the shell
downs to zero while the shell is halted. Meanwhile the pressure rises
inside the airbag and so its internal energy. The final blast open of
the airbag sends the compressed and hot airbag gas away in the
surroundings before it could transfer its energy back to the probe and
would make it jump upwards.